At the April 20, 2023 BPAC meeting, OakDOT Policy & Intergovernmental Affairs Senior Advisor, Tony Dang presented on AB 645 and requested a motion of support for the bill. An excerpt of the presentation is below, followed by the full presentation.
A motion for the BPAC to draft and submit a letter of support for California State Assembly Bill 645 was made (Gardner), seconded (Ralston), and approved unanimously by roll call vote with the following Commissioners voting in favor: Campbell, Frank, Gardner, Lok, Ralston, Schader, and Yee.
Assembly Bill 645
- Pilot program for Speed Cameras in 6 cities for 5 years
- Oakland, San Francisco, San Jose, Los Angeles, Glendale, and Long Beach
- Likely up to 18 systems in Oakland
- Cameras can be placed in the following places:
- High Injury Corridors
- School Zones
- Streets with high incidents of speed racing and motor vehicle exhibitions of speed
Strong privacy protections
- Operated by a local DOT; Records must be kept confidential.
- Must delete photos/ video within 5 business days if there is no violation.
- Requires photos/ video to be destroyed after 60 days after final adjudication, 120 days for administrative records. Permits cities to destroy them sooner.
- Prohibits the use of facial recognition software.
Strong equity protections
- Non-moving violations without photos of drivers’ faces
- Must offer a diversion program, ticket fee reductions between 50% to 80%, and payment plan options for low-income populations
- Must work with stakeholders to develop a Speed Safety System Use Policy, which includes location selection
- Flexibility & Warnings: 1-10 mph doesn’t get a ticket; camera locations must have signs posted; 60-day warning period
- Must conduct racial and economic equity impact analysis as part of pilot program evaluation
Presentation















